Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Christensen v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
John Robert Christensen, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Darcy v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03196
Plaintiff:
Alan Peter Darcy
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Roberts v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00392
Defendant:
Thomas McCollum, Tommy McCollum, Infinite Communications, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Roberts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
El v. Harris et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, John Roberts and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. John Sayles
as 21-4650
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT SAYLES
Williams v. Greene
as 1:2021cv01590
Respondent:
David Greene
Petitioner:
John Robert Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Phelps
as 6:2021cv00954
Petitioner:
John Robert-Deon Davis
Respondent:
NFN Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richey v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv03330
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John Robert Richey
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Trump
as 20-6934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and MITCH MCCONNELL
John Demos, Jr. v. Mitch McConnell
as 20-6845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, MITCH MCCONNELL, U.S. Senate Majority Leader and MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
