Cases 21 - 30 of 42
WILSON v. PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA et al
as 1:2020cv00432
Defendant:
MINISTRY OF CIVIL AFFAIRS OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA, WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY, PEOPLES GOVERNMENT OF THE CITY OF WUHAN and others
Plaintiff:
MR. JAMES BARRETT WILSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chand v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Ms. Murphy, C.O. Sexton, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Vincent Chand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Pierce et al
as 1:2019cv03166
Defendant:
Holly Pierce, RNP, Dr. Arresahegn Getachen, M.D., Terri Prior, RNP and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. James A. Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Malamatis v. Driven Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02222
Defendant:
Brands, Inc. Driven, Franchisor, Inc. Meineke, Driven Brands, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. James N. Malamatis and James N. Malamatis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nanney v. Ace Check Cashing
as 3:2019cv01424
Plaintiff:
Mr. James David Nanney and James David Nanney
Defendant:
Ace Check Cashing, Ronald L. Moore, JPay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houck v. Warden et al
as 8:2019cv01325
Respondent:
Warden and Office of the Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mr. James E. Houck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meyerhoffer v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00230
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Meyerhoffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Holley et al
as 2:2018cv00611
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Defendant:
James W. Holley, IV, Mrs. James W. Holley, III and James W. Holley, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Williams v. Pierce, NP
as 1:2018cv02004
Plaintiff:
Mr. James M Williams
Defendant:
Holly Pierce, NP
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
