Cases 21 - 30 of 48
McCoy v. Washington Gas Company et al
as 8:2015cv02804
Plaintiff:
William Thomas McCoy
Defendant:
Washington Gas Company, WGL, Holding Inc., Vincent L. Ammann, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01432
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCallister v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv27710
Plaintiff:
Erin McCallister
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John D. McCallister v. Ernie R. Lee
as 14-1817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. MCCALLISTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNIE R. LEE, JOSEPH B. GILBERT, DEWEY HUDSON and others
Bowlus et al v. Caldera Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24639
Plaintiff:
Dixie Bowlus , Virginia Babauta , Shirley Babler and others
Defendant:
Caldera Medical, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc. , C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCallister v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv17219
Plaintiff:
Tonyia McCallister
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCallister v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv05251
Plaintiff:
Evie McCallister
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCallister v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02073
Plaintiff:
Tammie L. McCallister
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCallister v. Lee, et al
as 7:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
John D. McCallister
Defendant:
Ernie R. Lee, Joseph B. Gilbert, Dewey Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCallister v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05336
Plaintiff:
Laveta A. McCallister
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
