Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Green v. USA - 2255
as 1:2015cv02621
Petitioner:
Shawn Michael Green
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Michael Greene
as 13-4875
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL GREENE, a/k/a Mike
Green v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv01897
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. M&M Collision Experts, Inc.
as 13-1008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
M&M COLLISION EXPERTS, INC., trading as Vince's Body Shop
Defendant:
COACH WORKS AUTO COLLISION REPAIR CENTER, INC., d/b/a Vince's Body Shop and MICHAEL GREEN
L v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 3:2012cv03617
Plaintiff:
A L
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice , Jeffrey Carnes , Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07057
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Green and James Michael Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Brent Green
as 11-7735
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRENT MICHAEL GREEN, a/k/a Big Bruce
Hess et al v. The United States of America
as 1:2011cv01294
Plaintiff:
L. Stephen Hess , Marian C. Green , Michael Green and others
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Green v. Unknown
as 1:2011cv00417
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Green
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greene v. USA
as 3:2011cv00143
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
