Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Ponder v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00019
Plaintiff: Cassandra Marie Ponder
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Emerging Technology Support, LLC v. Ponder
as 1:2013cv03905
Plaintiff: Emerging Technology Support, LLC
Defendant: Michael A. Ponder
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Emerging Technology Support, LLC v. Ponder We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00341
Plaintiff: Emerging Technology Support, LLC
Defendant: Michael A. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ponder v. South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01444
Petitioner: Bobby Ponder
Respondent: Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parks v. North Carolina State University et al
as 5:2009cv00125
Plaintiff: Michele Palmer Parks
Defendant: North Carolina State University, Gerald Ponder, Jessica Wery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Zapata v. Ponder and Co. Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00019
Plaintiff: John Zapata
Defendant: Ponder and Co. Inc., The Guarantee Company of North America and Trusstee of Gaston College
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract None
Bobby Ponder v. Warden, Lee Correctional Insti We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6462
Petitioner - Appellant: BOBBY PONDER
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Rivera v. Ponder
as 3:2007cv00453
Plaintiff: Fidel U. Rivera
Defendant: Charles C. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ponder v. State of South Carolina
as 3:2007cv00778
Petitioner: Bobby Ponder
Respondent: Warden Lee Correctional Institution and Warden Lee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?