Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Snyder v. Roney et al
as 3:2015cv00438
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Snyder
Defendant:
Roney, Reedy and Langly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Isaac v. Phillips et al
as 3:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
Derwin L. Isaac
Defendant:
Mike Phillips, Jeffrey Minton, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roney v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Brandon K. Roney
Defendant:
John Doe, Mail Room Employees and Martinsburg Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayers et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07930
Plaintiff:
Gayle Ayers and Roney Ayers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mable v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Ezra Mable
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, Baltimore City Police Department, Ed Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roney et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00232
Plaintiff:
Frances Roney and James Roney
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roney et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Roney and Rocky Roney
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bishop et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2012cv03460
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann Bishop , Donald Bishop , Estrella Jo Cox and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roney et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Lisa Roney and Rufus Roney
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
