Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Roop et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04065
Plaintiff:
Vicki Lee Roop and Frank Logan Roop
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roope v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Andrea R. Roope
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Roop et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07111
Plaintiff:
Favienne Roop and Brian Roop
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roop v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06683
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Roop
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE ESTATE OF BLANCHE BURGESS CRAVEN et al
as 1:2014cv00745
Plaintiff:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF BLANCHE BURGESS CRAVEN , MARY FRANCES ROOP , JAMES E. HODGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32920
Plaintiff:
Amber Clavesilla , Martha Martin , Jo Strauch and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roop v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv31637
Plaintiff:
Christina Roop
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roop v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2012cv00632
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, J. T. Whitt and Sheriff J. T. Whitt
Plaintiff:
Brad L. Roop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rankins v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2012cv03591
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rankins
Defendant:
City of Charleston, City of Jackson, City of Cape Girardeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roop v. Astrue
as 7:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
James E. Roop
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
