Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 267
Wilson v. USP Lee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00136
Plaintiff: Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant: USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kristopher Daniels v. Shirk
as 23-6296
Plaintiff / Appellant: KRISTOPHER OWEN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee: SHIRK, Unit Manager, USP HAZELTON MEDICAL, USP HAZELTON COMPOUND, Facility Operations and others
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023hc02060
Petitioner: Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent: USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023ct03068
Plaintiff: Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant: USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Santiago v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00064
Plaintiff: Marcos F. Santiago
Defendant: J. C. Streeval, Dye, Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. Warden of USP Lee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00007
Petitioner: Johnnie Edward Banks, Jr
Respondent: Mrs. FNU Zook and Warden of USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vang v. Catawba Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff: Pakuja Crystal Vang
Defendant: Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Bethany Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7471
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Elrod v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00264
Petitioner: Kevin Earl Elrod
Respondent: USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Rosemond v. Richard Hudgins
as 22-7188
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES ROSEMOND
Respondent / Appellee: RICHARD HUDGINS, Warden, USP Hazelton

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?