Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Van Horn v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05356
Plaintiff:
Betty Van Horn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Van Horn v. Ballard
as 1:2010cv00080
Petitioner:
Kirby L Van Horn
Defendant:
David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Horn v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01062
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Van Horn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Van Horn v. Cross
as 1:2009cv00150
Petitioner:
Robert Van Horn
Respondent:
James Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown et al v. Bass et al
as 1:2009cv01034
Plaintiff:
Terry Brown and Jessyca Brown
Defendant:
Carol Bass and Van Horn Lane LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Van Horn v. Zurich American Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv02124
Plaintiff:
James Van Horn and James Van Horn
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Holland et al v. Keldan Mining Company, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01167
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Holland, Michael H. Holland, Michael H. Holland and others
Defendant:
Keldan Mining Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jonathan Riches v. Kenneth Van Horn
as 08-7303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
EDWARD COKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS BOOTS and KENNETH VAN HORN
VanHorn et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2008cv02745
Plaintiff:
G Bruce VanHorn and Karen Van Horn
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
