Cases 21 - 30 of 13,090
Dickerson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00491
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Jermaine D. Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv02609
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davidson and Byrant Davis
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, Jide Shamoye and Warden Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Napier
as 5:2024cv04862
Respondent:
Warden Napier
Petitioner:
Cedric Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bates v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
Keandre Bates
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mitchell v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00487
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Tadaris Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tucker v. Diggs
as 5:2024hc02159
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Diggs
Petitioner:
Darryl Leonard Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Janson
as 0:2024cv04841
Respondent:
Warden Jansen, FCI Edgefield and Warden Janson
Petitioner:
Rahshjeem Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Washam v. Gulley
as 7:2024cv00610
Respondent:
Warden Gulley
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Washam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stovall v. Ray, Warden
as 5:2024cv00176
Respondent:
H.L. Ray, Warden
Petitioner:
Jacquill Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Casillas v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
David Casillas
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
