Cases 31 - 40 of 627
Cruz v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Cruz
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Manuel Moreno v. Carol Bosholm
as 23-6890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL MORENO
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. CAROL C. BOSHOLM
Defendant:
JAPETH BETT, JOSE CRUZ, JEREMY EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Cruz v. Diliusovich et al
as 8:2023cv02752
Plaintiff:
Machelle Cruz
Defendant:
Khaziev Diliusovich, EAN HOLDINGS, LLC, Khaziev Artur Diliusovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Cruz Ramos et al v. Precision Walls Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manuel Cruz Ramos, Juan Fernando Cruz Ramos, Leilan Cruz Ramos and others
Defendant:
Precision Walls Inc. and EGB Drywall Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Eric Cruz v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04905
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daniel Hernandez-Cruz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1997
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Heriberto Perez
as 23-4596
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HERIBERTO PEREZ, a/k/a Alexis Santana-Cruz
US v. Heriberto Perez
as 23-4597
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HERIBERTO PEREZ, a/k/a Alexis Santana-Cruz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
