Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Davis v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv14718
Plaintiff:
Hughtrisha J. Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Carrillo et al
as 5:2015ct03170
Plaintiff:
Willie Branch
Defendant:
T. Carrillo, R. Wright and J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09532
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. The Wake County Administration et al
as 5:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
The Wake County Administration, Raleigh City Administration to Wake County, Jesus M. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. State Farm Life Insurance Company
as 7:2015cv00028
Defendant:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Debra J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Davies et al
as 3:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Gary J. Davies and David P. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv29539
Plaintiff:
Sonya J. Davis
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laphonia Oglesby v. Officer Lanaganstine
as 14-1882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAPHONIA MARS OGLESBY, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Lorenzo Rouse, deceased Estate of Lorenzo Rouse
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER LANAGANSTINE and MELVIN RANSOM, HSCII
Defendant:
WARDEN BURTT, ASSISTANT WARDEN MCKEITHER BODISON, OFFICER URIEL PALMER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
