Cases 31 - 40 of 3,306
Moultrie v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Counselor P. Adams and Major Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick White, Major King, Nurse Practitioner Jesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Gregory Darnell Graves
Defendant:
J.R. Adams, Sgt. J. Grubb and Rick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deafueh Monbo v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.
as 24-1292
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., HARFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., ESKINDER AFEWORK, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
SMALLS v. North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
THERRAN RASHEED SMALLS
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department, Officer Adams, Officer Jellico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Cory Adam Martin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Adams, Sr.
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC doing business as Pilot Flying J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Collins, Williams, Neece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
