Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Joseph Mays v. T. Smith
as 20-7540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HALFAST, Case Manager, OFFICER SLAYDON, OFFICER GLASS and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Cook Medical Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00534
Defendant:
William Cook Europe, APS, Cook Medical LLC and Cook Medical Incorporated
Plaintiff:
JAMES B SMITH and James B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00921
Defendant:
JOY GLOBAL UNDERGROUND MINING, LLC, ITT CORPORATION, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
SADIE B. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
GUARDIPEE et al v. RAJ TRANSPORT, INC., et al
as 1:2020cv00833
Plaintiff:
ANNA N. GUARDIPEE and ANDREW S. BURTON
Defendant:
RAJ TRANSPORT, INC. and WILLIAM B. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
TYLER v. FERGUSON et al
as 1:2020cv00805
Defendant:
JAMES O'NELL, PAUL A. SHANNER, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-7235
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-6628
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
GRADY v. STAFF AT SOUTHERN C.I. et al
as 1:2020cv00054
Defendant:
OFFICER. B. SMITH, KEVIN KING, DR. EDWARD LANCE and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 19-7850
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Thomas B Smith, ADDX Corporation, Future Technologies Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
