Cases 31 - 40 of 75
BONE EL v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE BONE EL
Defendant:
GEORGE T. SOLOMON, JACK CLELLAND and R. MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONE EL v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE BONE EL
Defendant:
GEORGE T. SOLOMON, JACK CLELLAND and R. MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bone El v. Solomon et al
as 5:2017ct03101
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Bone El
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, Jack Clelland and R. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bone v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Janet M Bone
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
US v. Halisi Uhuru
as 16-4838
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HALISI UHURU, a/k/a Arthur Lee Gert Wright, a/k/a Gritty, a/k/a Bones, a/k/a Big Homey
Bone et al v. A W Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
Debra Grayson Bone , Wilson O Grayson, Jr , Carol Grayson Williams and others
Defendant:
A W Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Covil Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bone v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15659
Plaintiff:
Susan Bone
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWN Production Company, LLC v. Bone
as 5:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
SWN Production Company, LLC
Defendant:
Robert O. Bone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bone et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12158
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Bone and Jeffery C. Bone
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ricky Salazar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 15-6346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY SALAZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., BOP Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
