Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Gordon v. Wexford et al
as 1:2019cv01676
Plaintiff:
Lamont Gordon
Defendant:
Wexford, Corizon Health, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sims v. Maryland Department of Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2019cv00704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dr. Derosa, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Allen Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Corizon Health Inc.
as 1:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
Dalvaro K. Weaver
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Safar v. Prince George's County, MD et al
as 8:2016cv03277
Plaintiff:
Fadwa Safar
Defendant:
Prince George's County, MD , Mary Lou McDonough , Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Grethen v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. GRETHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, GENE M. JOHNSON, former VDOC Director, JOHN JABE, former VDOC Deputy Director and others
Hardy v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Keyon Sante Hardy
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon, LLC and Charles Pheiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRIETO v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00042
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , HOWARD NAYLOR FITZHUGH, JR., M.D. and VALARIE MAE GOINES, F.N.P.
Plaintiff:
SONIA PRIETO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NFR, LLC et al v. NFC, LLC
as 3:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
NFR, LLC , NFNN, LLC , NFC, LLC and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
