Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Smith
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Thirdparty_defendant:
Teah Panteloglous, Lariah Jackson, Shaina Snyder and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Timothy David Smith
Cross_claimant:
Timothy David Smith
Cross_defendant:
Lariah Jackson, Teah Panteloglous, Chrystal Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Curtis Burston, Jr.
as 16-7741
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS BURSTON, JR., a/k/a Black, a/k/a David Smith, a/k/a Melvin Roberts, a/k/a David Brown
US v. David Parker
as 16-7039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ISAAC PARKER, a/k/a David Green, a/k/a David Smith, a/k/a Jay Smith, a/k/a David Isaac Parker-El
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04237
Plaintiff:
Susan Smith and David Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al. v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02036
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Smith and David Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. USA
as 5:2016cv00085
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James David Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Hudson David Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. USA
as 4:2015cv05042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua David Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
