Cases 31 - 40 of 904
US v. James Gandy, Jr.
as 24-6163
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox, Thomas Elsberry, William English and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ernest Jones v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06976
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lovejoy v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Lovejoy
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vereen v. DaShields et al
as 4:2023cv06835
Plaintiff:
Ernest Vereen
Defendant:
Percy DaShields, Jennifer DaShields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Peto v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Ernest John Peto
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lovejoy v. SCRJ Medical and Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Lovejoy
Defendant:
SCRJ Medical and Jail and SCRJ COs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. James Gandy, Jr.
as 23-7090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
