Cases 31 - 40 of 309
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. MCDOWELL
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, P.R.E.A. CORRDINATOR MS. COVINGTON, CHIEF AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alliance Funding Group v. McLeanics Technology Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Alliance Funding Group
Defendant:
McLeanics Technology Corporation and James McLean, Jr.
McLean v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv03694
Plaintiff:
Kevin Terrell McLean, Terrell Kevin McLean and Kevin McLean
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Spartanburg County, Chuck Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
MEYERS v. HAFEEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SGT. MR. HAFEEZ, SGT. MR. HUNT, OFFICER MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mortgage Corporation v. Nader
as 1:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
McLean Mortgage Corporation
Counter Claimant:
James Nader
Defendant:
James Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
McLean v. USA
as 7:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Christopher Neil McLean
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marcus McLean v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6418
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS MCLEAN
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and COUNTY OF WAKE
US v. Omel McLean
as 22-4083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
OMEL MCLEAN, a/k/a Webb, a/k/a Webster Perry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
