Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Lydia Robledo et al. v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30422
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lydia Robledo , Dee Moreno , Diana Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gallipeau v. Ham
as 3:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Gallipeau
Defendant:
Linda Mickens Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Gallipeau v. Ham
as 9:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Gallipeau
Defendant:
Linda Mickens Ham and James R Metts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. John Micken
as 12-7667
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY MICKENS, a/k/a 21
Dennis Gallipeau v. Linda Mickens-Ham
as 12-7508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS MICHAEL GALLIPEAU
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA MICKENS-HAM
Defendant:
JANE DOE, LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and OFFICER MACK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dwight Jones v. Correctional Care Solution
as 10-7111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT XAVIER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, DENNIS A. TRACY, SERGEANT KLAUSEN, Lexington County Detention Center and others
Defendant:
LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LCMANET and LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Dwight Jones v. Correctional Care Solutions
as 09-8239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT XAVIER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, DENNIS A. TRACY, SERGEANT KLAUSEN, Lexington County Detention Center and others
Defendant - None:
LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LCMANET and LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
