Cases 31 - 40 of 220
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O J. BOYD, C/O J. GILBERT and others
Cooper v. Mullens
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Mullens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00856
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mullen
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mullen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Christina Lee Mullen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mullen v. Krammes et al
as 7:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Shannon Mullen
Defendant:
Isaac Krammes and Town of Sunset Beach, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charlie Hardin v. D. Everett
as 23-6105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. EVERETT, Superintendent, CAPTAIN TURLEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MULLEN and others
Cherenfant v. FCC Butner Wardens et al
as 5:2023ct03023
Plaintiff:
Nertant Cherenfant
Defendant:
FCC Butner Wardens, FCI 2 Butner, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Riddick v. Mullens et al
as 7:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Steven Riddick
Defendant:
Lt. M. Mullens, Sgt. Rose, C/O Mullens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Evans et al
as 5:2022ct03407
Plaintiff:
Randolph Morrison
Defendant:
Dr. Charlotte Ann Evans, Nurse Rhonna Medlin, Kendell Mullens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
