Cases 31 - 40 of 834
US v. Kenneth Reid
as 23-7209
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH ROSHAUN REID
Hahn v. Reid et al
as 7:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Arin Christopher Hahn
Defendant:
C/O Reid, Sgt. Miller, Superintendent Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Reid v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Mark D Reid
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Robert Reid v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05445
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wooten et al v. The Boppy Company, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02695
Plaintiff:
Zaleiph Wooten and Tawana Patina Reid
Defendant:
The Boppy Company, LLC, Walmart Inc. and Artsana S.P.A. doing business as Artsana Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reid v. United States
as 7:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Young et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04868
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Young, Ashley Palmer, Chris Plummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
