Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Hallinan et al v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2020hc02088
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Maldonado, Anthony Butler, Troy A. Titus and others
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal, Warden Thomas Scarantino and Jeffrey Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wolfe v. Robinson et al
as 8:2020cv01915
Defendant:
Associate Warden Alyson Glidewell, Associate Warden Thomas Robinson, Assistant Warden Leeman and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Wolf
as 8:2019cv03154
Petitioner:
Lonnie D. Nixon
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mabine v. Scarantino
as 5:2019hc02298
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Mabine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cason v. Sterling et al
as 1:2019cv02400
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Williams and Director Brian Sterling
Petitioner:
Garey Emil Cason, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fussa v. Moyer et al
as 1:2019cv01888
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Kitchen, D. Corcoron and others
Plaintiff:
Hector Fussa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Blagmon v. Meyer
as 3:2019cv00245
Petitioner:
Darnell Bernard Blagmon
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teresa Miller v. WVDOC
as 17-6463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a/k/a WVDOC, COMMISSIONER JIM RUBENSTEIN, WARDEN LAURA LORI NOHE and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, MR. MEED, MR. MEEK and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
