Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Whitted v. Simmons et al
as 4:2016cv01701
Plaintiff:
Joshua Emanuel Whitted
Defendant:
Dorothy Simmons, Lt. Sanderson, Major West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitted v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Stacy L. Whitted
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Whitted v. Coakley
as 5:2015cv15262
Plaintiff:
James Whitted
Defendant:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitted v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14147
Plaintiff:
Keisha Whitted
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Pinney et al
as 5:2013ct03324
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Johnson
Defendant:
J.S. Pinney, A. Freeman, W.R. Whitted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitted et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30593
Plaintiff:
Dawna Whitted and Ronald Whitted
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Whitted-Justice v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
as 5:2013cv00622
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Whitted-Justice
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Union Carbide Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fortenberry v. National Telecommunications Cooperative Association
as 1:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
John Whit Fortenberry
Defendant:
National Telecommunications Cooperative Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mark Barnes v. David Whitted
as 12-8164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID J. WHITTED, Deputy Assitant Commonwealth Attorney and H. K. BEVERLY, JR., Attorney Private
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.