Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02423
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. LEWISBURG CITY COURT et al
as 1:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
EARL BROWN
Defendant:
MARSHALL COUNTY COURT and WILLIAM EARL BROWN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE
as 1:2008cv00885
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. BROWN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shenoy v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al
as 3:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
B. Vittal Shenoy
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Mercy Health Services Inc, Mercy Hospital Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. WCCH Holdings, Incorporated et al
as 7:2008cv00220
Plaintiff:
William Augustus Brown
Defendant:
WCCH Holdings, Incorporated, Paul Morin and Charles Harris
Cause Of Action: Diversity
US v. William Brown
as 08-4083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN
Brown et al v. The Anchor Packing Company et al
as 1:2007cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jewell Johnson Brown, Jewell Johnson Brown, Jewell Johnson Brown and others
Defendant:
The Anchor Packing Company, A.W. Chesterton, Bayer CropScience Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
