Cases 41 - 50 of 168
In Re: Patricia Clark
as 19-325
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICIA DIANE CLARK, a/k/a Trisha Forbes, a/k/a Trisha Clark
Forbes v. Clarke
as 1:2019cv00969
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Petitioner:
Christopher Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Seelig v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 19-6953
Defendant:
MR. HUNTER, SGT. OLIVER, MR. MOORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL E. SEELIG
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH LASSITER, THOMAS ASBELL, CAPTAIN ENSLOW and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sovereign v. Clarke et al
as 1:2019cv00568
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, Stacey Meinhard, D. S. Forbes and others
Plaintiff:
Jonah Jervais Sovereign
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Seelig v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 19-6445
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. STREETER, MR. HARVEY, LIEUTENANT HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL E. SEELIG
Harrison v. Gregg et al
as 3:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Artisha Gregg and Timothy Forbes
Plaintiff:
Earlando Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Trotman, Jr. v. Central State Hospital
as 19-6041
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. YARATHA, 39 - Number Indicates Building, LYTE, 39 - Number Indicates Building, DR. RANDALL FORBES, 113 - Number Indicates Building and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL TROTMAN, JR.
Gordon et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03371
Plaintiff:
Marquis (I) Gillen, Robert Duran, Glenda (I) Bailey and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03413
Plaintiff:
Don Medaris, Mittie Flournoy, Tina Sheeks and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
