Cases 41 - 50 of 195
Bobby Burghart v. Sarah Beyer
as 19-7450
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, L. LINDSAY, TERRY KIRKPATRICK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY BURGHART
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH BEYER
CANNON et al v. AUTOMONEY, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00877
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER TAYLOR, JULIA HARRISON, BRIAN BREVARD and others
Defendant:
AUTOMONEY, INC. and AUTOMONEY NORTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kane v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00238
Petitioner:
James F. Kane
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas Heyer v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
as 19-7027
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SARA M. REVELL, THOMAS R. KANE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, IKE EICHENLAUB, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PAUL BOYD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS HEYER
Fleming v. Haysi Regional Jail et al
as 7:2019cv00357
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kane Fleming
Defendant:
Haysi Regional Jail and Cpt. Trish Mcoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Boston v. William Bennett
as 19-6274
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA GROVE, Assistant Health Service Administrator, TIFFANY SMITH, Chief Dentist, THOMAS KANE, Director of B.O.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN BOSTON
Lyttle v. Kane
as 5:2019hc02013
Petitioner:
Melvin Ray Lyttle
Respondent:
Thomas R Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rice et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03397
Plaintiff:
Micheal Moody, Sherri Igou, Amanda Przymus and others
Defendant:
Chemguard, Tyco Fire Products LP, Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kane v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00746
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Aeden Kane
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
