Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Acosta v. Parham, et al
as 3:2017cv00596
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Stephen Hart Parham and Dominion Paving & Sealing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Iman v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv00418
Plaintiff: Adbul Hakim Iman
Defendant: Smith, Parham, Gutterup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Blair et al
as 1:2017cv00598
Plaintiff: Brandon M. Williams
Defendant: Tanya Blair and Antonio Parham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham v. Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.A. et al
as 8:2017cv01455
Plaintiff: Carrie Parham
Defendant: Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.A. , Nathan D. Willner and Laurie Lyons
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Parham v. Kay
as 8:2017cv01039
Plaintiff: Jefferson Clark Parham
Defendant: Robert Christian Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terell Moore v. Valerie Parham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-6531
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERELL MOORE
Defendant - Appellee: VALERIE PARHAM, Laundry Supervisor, DIANE DALE, Counselor, T. BARRETT, Registered Nurse and others
Defendant: R. CLAYTON, Registered Nurse and O. JONES, Correctional Officer
Parham v. Young We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv02016
Petitioner: Marcus Dwayne Parham
Respondent: David L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parham v. McDonald's Corporation
as 1:2017cv00705
Plaintiff: James Ronzell Parham
Defendant: McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Parham et al
as 1:2016cv01519
Plaintiff: Terell Moore
Defendant: Valerie Parham, Diane Dales, T. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00947
Plaintiff: Darrius Ferrell Saunders
Defendant: Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Lt. Parker, Lt. Dupri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?