Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Peterson v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 7:2016cv02874
Plaintiff:
Tracey Parris Peterson
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Purvey v. The Circuit Court of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2016cv02612
Plaintiff:
Joseph Purvey
Defendant:
The Circuit Court of Baltimore City, Yvette Bryant, Kenda Ausby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
In re: Leonard Parker
as 16-9935
Movant:
In re: LEONARD O'BRIEN PARKER, a/k/a Leonard O'Brien Parris
:
Farmer v. Stephens et al
as 5:2016hc02121
Petitioner:
Tyreke Michael Farmer
Respondent:
Donald W. Stephens, Donnie Harrison, W.C. Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chisholm v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01556
Petitioner:
Parris Benjamin Chisholm
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peterson v. Fluor Employees Group Disability Plan
as 7:2016cv01169
Plaintiff:
Tracey Parris Peterson
Defendant:
Fluor Employees Group Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Christopher West v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-7610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WEST, a/k/a Christopher Gearl West
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., in their individual and official capacity as corrections employees, under color of state law, WARDEN TIMOTHY RILEY, in their individual and official capacity as corrections employees, under color of state law, ASSOCIATE WARDEN GARY LANE, in their individual and official capacity as corrections employees, under color of state law and others
Parris v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 7:2015cv03986
Plaintiff:
Terry W Parris
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
US v. Samuel Parri
as 15-7021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL PARRIS
US v. Mark Parri
as 15-6928
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK JASON PARRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
