Cases 41 - 50 of 191
Rogers v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2018cv01227
Plaintiff:
John Rogers
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Steven B. Suchomski, Linda M. English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shaw v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv00782
Plaintiff:
Dameon Shaw
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Brandon Echevarria, Dexter Nazareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Meeks et al
as 2:2018cv00661
Plaintiff:
Mauro Gorostieta Hernandez
Defendant:
B J Meeks, Stephen Hoey, L Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manzaneda v. Duenas et al
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
Carmen M. Manzaneda
Defendant:
Aida Duenas, Joseph Luis Rosario, Samuel I. White, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Margarita Del Rosario
as 1:2018cv00234
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Margarita Del Rosario
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Manzaneda v. Duenas et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Carmen M. Manzaneda
Defendant:
Aida Duenas and Joseph Luis Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Logue v. Patient First Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv02097
Plaintiff:
Matthew S Logue
Defendant:
Patient First Corporation , Patient First Urgent Care, East York and Esmeralda Del Rosario, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alipio v. Tatem et al
as 1:2017cv01972
Plaintiff:
Rosario Alipio
Defendant:
Jeffrey Larry Tatem and Trinity Distribution Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rosario v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Dominga Gil Rosario
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lopez-Zarate et al v. Serna
as 7:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Miguel Lopez-Zarate , Ivan Ariel Baez-Quiazco , Jose Andres Barroso-Pacheco and others
Defendant:
Ruben Serna
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
