Cases 41 - 50 of 133
US v. John Swain
as 19-4741
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY SWAIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Swain v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2019ct03201
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Carlton Joyner, Peter Kuhns and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobey LaKemper v. George Solomon
as 19-6891
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN CARVER, Assistant Superintendent - Alexander C.I., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DULA, SRG Correctional Officer - Alexander C.I., GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of Prisons and others
Defendant:
ARTHUR A. SICIAK, Unit Manager - Alexander C.I., ERIC DYE, Assistant Superintendent - Alexander C.I., COLBERT RESPESS, Assistant Superintendent - Pasquotank C.I. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COBEY LAKEMPER
US v. Swain Clarke
as 19-6876
Defendant / Appellant:
SWAIN CLARKE, a/k/a Swain Clark
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Austin v. Swain County Detention Center et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Curtis Cochran, Leanna Arch and Swain County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Amy Michelle Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00018
Plaintiff:
Karl Monroe Swain
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Milton Brown v. U.M. Swain
as 19-6552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILTON BROWN, a/k/a Sultan Immanuel El-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
U.M. SWAIN
Clarke v. USA - 2255
as 1:2019cv00815
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Swain Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Swain
as 7:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Milton Antoine Brown and Sultan Imanuel El-Bey
Defendant:
U.M. Swain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hartley et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03398
Plaintiff:
Kathy Smith, Melody Horton, Nelda Lampe and others
Defendant:
National Foam Inc, Tyco Fire Products LP, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
