Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey
Defendant:
J.W. Mitchell, David A. Patrick, Thomas Chabot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Roberts v. Corey Walker
as 15-6507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON B. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
COREY WALKER, CCMSII, R. EBERSOLE, Lt., A. HARTLE, COMSII and others
Defendant:
DOCTOR LIN QUILLO, DOCTOR KEVEN JOHNSON and RN MICHELLE AUTREY
Stump v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31338
Plaintiff:
Valerie Ann Stump
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29014
Plaintiff:
Joyce A Allen , Rosalie Cynthia Armstrong , Melisia B Bass and others
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. , Covidien Holding, Inc. , Covidien, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aaron Roberts v. Corey Walker
as 14-6896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON B. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
COREY WALKER, CCMSII, R. EBERSOLE, Lt., A. HARTLE, COMSII and others
Defendant:
DOCTOR LIN QUILLO, DOCTOR KEVEN JOHNSON and RN MICHELLE AUTREY
Stump v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16770
Plaintiff:
Ruth Stump
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Walker et al
as 1:2014cv00720
Plaintiff:
Aaron B. Roberts
Defendant:
Corey Walker, R. Ebersole, A. Hartle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stump v. Commonwealth Of Virginia
as 7:2012cv00300
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Lee Stump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry v. Watkins et al
as 8:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
Ron Barry
Defendant:
H. Thomas Watkins , David P. Southwell , Timothy C. Barabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
