Cases 41 - 50 of 12,811
Ray Blanchard v. Brian Frosh
as 24-6473
Plaintiff:
RAY A. BLANCHARD
Defendant:
BRIAN E. FROSH, MCTC WARDEN and WILLIAM BOHRER
King v. Warden of WCI et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Plaintiff:
Kyeem King
Defendant:
Warden of WCI and Medical Provider for WCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. WARDEN - Lawrenceville Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tamir A. Wilson
Defendant:
WARDEN - Lawrenceville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwyer v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 5:2024cv03036
Petitioner:
Matthew C Dwyer
Respondent:
SCDC and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saenz-Quintero v. FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
as 0:2024cv03009
Petitioner:
Jose Saenz-Quintero
Respondent:
FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nealy v. Warden of MCTC et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Michael Nealy
Respondent:
Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blystone v. Bayliss, Warden
as 5:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Charles Blystone
Respondent:
Melissa Bayliss, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Damron v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Damron
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03111
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, Lt. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
