Cases 51 - 60 of 2,481
King v. USA
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Donald Eugene King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
King et al v. Carolinas Biofeedback Center (Biofeedback, LLC) et al
as 9:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maria King and Sally King
Defendant:
Carolinas Biofeedback Center (Biofeedback, LLC) and Melanie Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant:
Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Via, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6015
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, K. CROSBY, Regional Ombudsman for VDOC, BETH CABELL, Warden of Sussex II State Prison and others
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
