Cases 51 - 60 of 6,427
Gary Williams v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6156
Petitioner:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Dept. of Corrections
Clark v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
Mona Clark
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse, Inc., Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC, TR Real Estate Ventures of South Carolina, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hayes v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Mark Hayes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Clark
as 1:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James Robert Nelson
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Clark et al
as 5:2024ct03043
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Ms. Clark, Ms. Lee, Cpt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Christopher Lumpkin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6142
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Carlton v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
David L. Carlton
Defendant:
Shane Weber, Bradley Butler, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
