Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kilpatrick v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33367
Plaintiff:
Shirley Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kilpatrick et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28887
Plaintiff:
Betty P. Kilpatrick and Henry Kilpatrick
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathaniel Rice v. U.S.
as 13-7444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAYMON BYRD, Senior Officer and others
Ranes v. Samuels et al
as 5:2013ct03164
Plaintiff:
Tom Ranes
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr., Dr. Davis, Dr. Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Kilpatrick et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv12235
Plaintiff:
Margaret Kilpatrick and Isaac Kilpatrick
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kilpatrick et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv10428
Plaintiff:
Karen Kilpatrick and Charlie Kilpatrick
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kilpatrick et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07322
Plaintiff:
Shirley Kilpatrick and Michael Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WADDELL v. KILPATRICK et al
as 1:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LEON WADDELL
Defendant:
TERRY KILPATRICK, JUDE OUNOHA, SROBONA CHATTERJEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilpatrick v. USA
as 2:2012cv00080
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew Tab Kilpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
