Cases 61 - 70 of 3,448
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Williams v. Yes Care Corp.
as 24-6333
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
YES CARE CORP., SARAH JOHNSON, RN, DR. CLEM, M.D. and others
MCALLISTER v. NAPH CARE et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
NAPH CARE, MS. CORRELL, MS. COWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bussie v. Sharf
as 5:2024ct03114
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Dr. Sharf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
United States, Officer Bryant, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coates v. Lt. Keistler et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Alkein Coates
Defendant:
Lt. Keistler, Tyler, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Militana et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Anthony N. Mason
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Militana, C. Riner, C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Medical Staff RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Russell Odell Walters
Defendant:
Medical Staff RRJ, Security Staffing RRJ and Dr. Ronald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aurel v. Jessup Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Jessup Correctional Institution, Dr. Khalid El-Bedavei, MD, Dr. Muleta Obsu, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
