Cases 61 - 70 of 887
Drumgoole v. Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Raymond Drumgoole
Defendant:
Homeland Security, United States of |America, Michael A. Goldsticker, DA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
Robert Sharp
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shanda Gilyard v. Tammy Slinka
as 23-6094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANDA L. GILYARD
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY SLINKA, L. SMITH, P. ADAMS and others
Moller v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023ct03001
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Moller
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Satterfield v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2022hc02212
Petitioner:
Luther Earl Satterfield
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richard Gathercole v. US
as 22-7433
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. GATHERCOLE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Allen v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett, G.M. Alprin, Muriel Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunt v. Federal Correctional Institute Beckley et al
as 5:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Randolph Hunt
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institute Beckley and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Slade v. Heckard
as 5:2022cv00510
Petitioner:
Garland Slade
Respondent:
Katina Heckard, Federal Bureau of Prison and United States Attorney Genral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
