Cases 61 - 70 of 853
Freeman v. Murphy et al
as 2:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Fred Freeman
Defendant:
Judge Matie Murphy, Kelly B. Arnold, Deborah S. McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ussery v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Monica Faith Ussery
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Erik A. Hooks, Lorrin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC. OF IOWA et al
as 1:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
LAKISHA BAILEY FREEMAN
Defendant:
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC. OF IOWA, DAVON BAILEY CALHOUN and DAVON SHAQUILLE CALHOUN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, SATANA DEBERRY, AVERY MICHELLE CRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Frank Freeman and Jessica Freeman
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bret Allen Freeman et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02089
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bret Allen Freeman and Erika Renee Jaen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Freeman v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Frances Freeman
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
