Cases 61 - 70 of 3,625
Robert Moore v. Warden of W.C.I.
as 23-7263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF W.C.I. SHANE WEBER, NURSE TAMI OF W.C.I., DOCTOR OF W.C.I. JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Donna Franks et al v. 3M Company Inc
as 2:2023cv06476
Defendant:
3M Company Inc and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Plaintiff:
Donna Franks and Gary Franks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frank Carr v. Lynn Kelly
as 23-7241
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK CARR
Respondent / Appellee:
LYNN B. KELLY, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2266
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McDaniel v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Justice, North Carolina, North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stokes v. Oreskey et al
as 5:2023ct03336
Plaintiff:
Nazai Frank Stokes
Defendant:
Matthew Oreskey and Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omari Mason v. McKelvin #81
as 23-7201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI KEISAUN MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
MCKELVIN #81, Sergeant and JONES, Correctional Officer
Defendant:
KEVIN TALLEY, Lieutenant, FRANK MACK, Major, LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
