Cases 61 - 70 of 861
Meyers v. Freeman et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Freeman, FNU Honeycutt, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Quentin Freeman
Defendant:
FNU Turner, FNU Young, FNU Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Link et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02774
Plaintiff:
John Link, Jr., Keith Acton, Dennis Ahrens and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ronald Freeman v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02815
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Chemguard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC et al v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC and Dr. BEVERLY GRAY, MD
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, TODD M. WILLIAMS, JIM O'NEILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Hunt
as 3:2023cv02400
Plaintiff:
Jerome Freeman
Defendant:
Carissa Hunt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Gallman v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Gallman
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Corrections, Evans Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Freeman et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Frank Freeman and Jessica Freeman
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
