Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Ronald Prince v. U.S. Airways, Incorporated
as 08-2020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L PRINCE, Captain and WADE MURPHREE, Captain
Plaintiff - None:
THOMAS G. DAVIS, Capt., LARRY BURFIELD, Capt., WAYNE D. HAINES, Capt. and others
Plaintiff - Potential Intervenors/Appellee:
FRANK DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. AIRWAYS, INCORPORATED, US AIRWAYS GROUP, INCORPORATED, ALLEGHENY AIRLINES, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - None:
I.S. AIRWAYS LEASING AND SALES, INCORPORATED
Keeper v. Davis et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brian James Keeper
Defendant:
James Davis, Hancock County, The West Virginia Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis et al v. U.S. Airways, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Davis, Larry Burfield, Wayne D. Haines and others
Defendant:
U.S. Airways, Inc., U.S. Airways Group, Inc, Allegheny Airlines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Davis v. Dr. Reese et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Dr. Reese, Major Hull and Nurse Snydor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillan v. Davis et al
as 1:2007cv03002
Plaintiff:
Kim McMillan
Defendant:
James Davis, Sr. and Willie Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barnard v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2007cv00566
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barnard and Timothy Barnard
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Andrew Johnson, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.