Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Navarro v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13209
Plaintiff:
Norma L. Navarro
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05222
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Rose Navarro and Jesus Navarro
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Antonio Howie
as 15-6513
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO NAVARRO HOWIE
Portillo Cisneros v. Nav-Ex, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00717
Plaintiff:
Marleny Sugey Portillo Cisneros
Defendant:
Nav-Ex, LLC, Luis Navarro and Fabiola Navarro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dziekonski v. Thompson et al
as 8:2014cv03872
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dziekonski
Defendant:
Durke G. Thompson, Holly A. Whittier, Patricia P. Via and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Requeno Navarro et al v. Eternal Trendz Customs, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv02876
Plaintiff:
Ana Cecilia Requeno Navarro and Sara Roselia Barrera Gonzalez
Defendant:
Eternal Trendz Customs, LLC and William Senior
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Navarro Cifuentes v. AGA Services, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv02400
Plaintiff:
Anibal Ariel Navarro Cifuentes
Defendant:
AGA Services, LLC and Ever Enrique Vasquez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Navarro et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23075
Plaintiff:
Susie Jan Kimberlee Navarro and Salvador N. Navarro
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro v. Dallas et al
as 3:2014cv00267
Plaintiff:
Lorena Navarro
Defendant:
Town Of Dallas , Da'sha Tenise Leach and Patrick McSwain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saavedra et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09467
Plaintiff:
Celia Saavedra and Esteban Navarro
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
