Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,143
Century Surety Company v. Arete Beltline Property Owner LLC
as 3:2023cv03481
Plaintiff: Century Surety Company
Defendant: Arete Beltline Property Owner LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant: ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent: CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor: THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee: CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver: MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Horne v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00411
Plaintiff: Charles Ryan Horne
Defendant: Chad Hamilton, Derek Almorode and Rockbridge Regional Jail Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 23-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INCORPORATED, ENGAGE ARMAMENT LLC, ANDREW RAYMOND and others
Defendant / Appellee: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff: APAC-Atlantic, Inc.
Defendant: Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Findley v. United States of America, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03020
Plaintiff: Darrell Allen Findley
Defendant: United States of America, The, Joe Biden, James Wesley Whine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Gardner v. Owners Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00341
Plaintiff: Erica Gardner
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Choice Hotels International, Inc., et al v. Dahya Investments Incorporated et al
as 8:2023cv01685
Petitioner: Choice Hotels International, Inc., and Choice Hotels Owners Council
Respondent: Dahya Investments Incorporated and Dinu Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Great American Alliance Insurance Company v. Midtown Village Owners Association Inc et al
as 4:2023cv02847
Plaintiff: Great American Alliance Insurance Company
Defendant: Midtown Village Owners Association Inc and Karla Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Owners Insurance Company v. Rider et al
as 7:2023cv02802
Plaintiff: Owners Insurance Company
Defendant: Robert J Rider and Rhonda M Rider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?