Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beam v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv00472
Plaintiff:
Barbara Beam
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mill Creek Post & Beam Co. v. Goshen Timber Frames, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Mill Creek Post & Beam Co. and Mill Creek Post & Beam Co.
Defendant:
Goshen Timber Frames, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mill Creek Post & Beam Company v. Gillen et al
as 1:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
Mill Creek Post & Beam Company
Defendant:
Brian Gillen, Julie Gillen, The Rimer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beam v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00968
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Beam, Sr. and Joseph D. Beam, Sr.
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Ilinois Glass Co., The Stebbing Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beam v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00145
Plaintiff:
Rodney Paul Beam
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Berry et al v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03051
Plaintiff:
Monica Berry, Monica Berry, Kim Mills and others
Defendant:
Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc., Travis Real Estate Group Joint Venture, Travis Real Estate Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Beam v. Tatum
as 07-1719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK H. BEAM
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE TATUM, Commissioner, North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles, BRYAN BEATTY, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety and LYNDO TIPPETT, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Transportation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
