Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 20,726
Butterfield v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00304
Plaintiff: Suesan Butterfield
Defendant: Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Anton Matthews
as 24-4246
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANTON DEMETRIUS MATTHEWS, a/k/a Juv, a/k/a JoJo
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff: SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant: WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
Cesar Flores Nolasco v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner: CESAR FLORES NOLASCO, a/k/a Cesar Youany Flores, a/k/a Cesar Flores, a/k/a Cesar Yovany Flores Nolasco
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Boice et al v. K. Petroleum, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Richard Boice and Sandra Boice
Defendant: K. Petroleum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Cobbs v. Harrell et al
as 5:2024ct03106
Plaintiff: Rodney Elroy Cobbs
Defendant: Richard K. Harrell and Ricardo Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Antoine Cespedes
as 24-4247
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANTOINE DOMINICK CESPEDES, a/k/a Ghost, a/k/a Lul Twon
Christopher Henry v. Nurse Lydia
as 24-6438
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HENRY, a/k/a Chicken Man
Defendant: NURSE LYDIA, NURSE TAMARA, NURSE BRITTANY and others
US v. Nathaniel Mitchell
as 24-6437
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NATHANIEL TYREE MITCHELL, a/k/a Savage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00779
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?