Cases 81 - 90 of 128
Curry v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00530
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Curry
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 8:2017cv03727
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Thompson
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bowers v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv00596
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Bowers
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamlin v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc
as 2:2017cv02648
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Hamlin
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Odom v. Cannon et al
as 5:2017cv02487
Petitioner:
Christopher Odom
Respondent:
Al Cannon, Chief Beatty, Stephanie Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Allen v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc
as 2:2017cv02133
Plaintiff:
Tammy Allen
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Botchie v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00555
Plaintiff:
Michael Botchie
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
I.N. v. Dollar Tree Store #02829 et al
as 5:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
I.N.
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Store #02829, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Greenbrier International, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Ningbo Bestco Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., t/d/b/a Cheerway Enterprises Co., Ltd.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Greenbrier International, Inc. and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R. Alexander Acosta v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 17-1571
Petitioner:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Respondent:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
