Cases 81 - 90 of 141
Caldis et al v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2014cv01849
Plaintiff:
Grant Caldis and Ingrid Tierens
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company , Starbucks Corporation , John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 953.209 Acres, More or Less, in Monroe County Located on Parcel Identification No. 03-21-53.2 et al
as 1:2014cv09250
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
953.209 Acres, More or Less, in Monroe County Located on Parcel Identification No. 03-21-53.2, Virginia C. Alexander, Jacqueline L. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Smyth v. News Channel 7 et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 7:2013cv03363
Plaintiff:
Keith Adger Smyth
Defendant:
News Channel 7, WHNS TV Fox 21 News, WYFF TV 4 News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28851
Plaintiff:
Vivian Ross
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Jane Doe Corporations 21-40 and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Clark v. County of Fairfax, Virginia
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC S. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA, RICHARD W. NAGEL, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia, R. L. DAVIS, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia and others
State Farm Fire and Casualty v. Chijoke Akamiro
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-1959
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIJOKE AKAMIRO, Default Noted 3/21/2013
Defendant:
FREDERICK STARKES, Default Noted 3/21/13
US v. Chong Chen
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-7197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHONG CHAO CHEN, a/k/a 21
Jones v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv15562
Plaintiff:
Janet M. Jones
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , John Does 1-20 and Jane Doe Corporations 21-40
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fobber v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2013cv15568
Plaintiff:
Marie D. Fobber
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , John Does 1-20 and Jane Doe Corporations 21-40
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.