Cases 81 - 90 of 28,948
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider, ERIC DYE, Warden, JEFFREY DUNCAN, Assistant Warden and others
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6499
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, Laurens County Jail, KIM LITTLE, Mental Health Laurens County Jail and others
Linder v. Tolson et al
as 9:2024cv03159
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Linder
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John G. Hicks, Sgt. Ratchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6492
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider Individual and Official Capacity, ALEXANDER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Official Capacity, JANE DOE, Nurse Individual and Official Capacity and others
Riley v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
John Robert Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America
Fitzgerald v. Jane Doe et al
as 5:2024ct03130
Plaintiff:
Shawreed Jawon Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and John Doe Deputy Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. John Leite & Lisa Clark Trust
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jack V. Smith and Kerstin A. Lanier
Defendant:
John Leite & Lisa Clark Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Hehl v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Hehl
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Moaf et al v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Mohsen Moaf and Jacqueline A Moaf
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Dan Gordon, Robert Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
David Babb v. David Isom
as 24-1456
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY BABB
Defendant:
DAVID ISOM, General Manager for Safe Harbor, RUDY SOCHA, CEO, Wounded Nature Working Veterans, JOHN J. TECKLENBURG, Retired and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
