Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Segars v. Truist Bank
as 9:2022cv01869
Defendant:
Truist Bank and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Segars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Rivers v. Wynne et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Bank of the James Financial Group Inc., John Wynne, James Wynne and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal VL Rivers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert Johnson v. Truist
as 22-1628
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST
Smith v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv01336
Plaintiff:
Robinette Gravely Smith
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Henderson v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kim F. Henderson
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Michael R. Cogan, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Truist
as 3:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Truist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Power v. Truist Bank
as 6:2022cv00771
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Jon D Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lawrence and Louis Company D/B/A Hidden Oasis Salon v. Truist Bank
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Lawrence and Louis Company D/B/A Hidden Oasis Salon
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Wade et al v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade and Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank and BB&T Merger, Suntrust "Truist" Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
SCALES v. TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
CORA SCALES
Defendant:
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION doing business as BB&T BANK and AMANDA LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
